Thursday, October 20, 2016

FBI: Everything Hillary Said About Emails Was a Lie. So Why No Prosecution.

FBI: Everything Hillary Said About Emails Was a Lie. So Why No Prosecution.

FBI director James Comey announced on Tuesday morning that he would not be recommending that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton be prosecuted for mis-handling classified information. But in the course of his presentation, he demonstrated that literally everything she and her campaign had told America about her email servers was a complete lie.

1. FALSE: Hillary Clinton never sent any classified information, or emails containing information marked “classified.” Comey concluded that “a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information.” He also noted: “even if information is not marked ‘classified’ in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.” And he noted:
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
2. FALSE: Hillary Clinton turned over all work-related emails to the State Department. Comey: “The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014.” He added that Clinton’s lawyers left those out because they “did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails.” And he added that : “three of those [deleted e-mails] were classified at the time they were sent or received.”
3. FALSE: Hillary Clinton was allowed to use a private e-mail server. Comey noted that “any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for” some of the information she was sharing. And he concluded that she was “extremely careless” with classified information, though he would not recommend prosecution.
4. FALSE: Hillary Clinton’s server was not hacked by foreign adversaries.Clinton claimed it was impossible that her server was hacked. But Comey said: “She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”
5. FALSE: Hillary Clinton had only used a single mobile device for email.Comey noted the use of multiple e-mail devices, and multiple servers: “Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain.”
6. FALSE: Hillary Clinton’s lawyers had read every single one of her emails before deleting the “personal” ones. As Time notes:
Clinton press secretary Nick Merrill previously told TIME that her attorneys had individually read every email to determine if it was a government document or personal correspondence. “Every one of the more than 60,000 emails were read. Period,” Merrill wrote in one email to a TIME reporter dated March 14, 2015.
The FBI concluded that this claim was false.
7. FALSE: Hillary Clinton had no intention of deleting emails or “wiping” her servers. Comey noted a deliberate effort by Clinton’s lawyers to cover her tracks by destroying information: “It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.”
If anything demonstrates intent, it is surely Clinton’s repeated evasion of the law, and her constant lies and cover-ups.
But the Department of Justice will certainly decline to prosecute, meaning that only the voters can keep Hillary Clinton out of office.
This post has been updated with new information — specifically, items #4, #5, #6 and #7.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. His new book, See No Evil: 19 Hard Truths the Left Can’t Handle, will be published by Regnery on July 25 and is available for pre-order through Amazon. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.


Morning Joe Highlights Democrats Claiming 2000 and 2004 Elections Were Unfair, Stolen

MSNBC’s Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski on Thursday described the hypocrisy of Democrats criticizing Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump for saying that the 2016 election will be “rigged.”
Trump has repeatedly said on the campaign trail the election is “rigged” in favor of  his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton and that the whole electoral system is unfair. Trump has received criticism from Democrats and members of the media for this talking point. However, Morning Joe noted that Democrats have a history of claiming that elections were unfair or stolen.
Brzezinski highlighted several examples in response to criticism of Trump leaving the door open to contesting the election results during Wednesday night’s debate. Trump was asked whether he would accept the outcome of the election if he loses in November.
“I will tell you at the time … I’ll keep you in suspense, okay?” Trump said.
Brzezinski listed several examples of Democrats claiming that the 2000 and 2004 elections were rigged or stolen.
“In 2000, Jesse Jackson demanded an inquiry of the results in Florida, saying shortly after the election, ‘Twenty-two thousand people are begging for their vote to count and for its intent to be realized. This last vote caused a crisis in the credibility of this election. This is a crisis of integrity. We the American people deserve better. We should settle for nothing less,'” Brzezinski said.
Brzezinski also read an excerpt of an interview that Rolling Stone published in 2004 with former Democratic National Committee chairman and Clinton surrogate Howard Dean.
“[Rolling Stone] also published the interview with Howard Dean, which said this, Howard said this: ‘I’m not confident that the election in Ohio was fairly decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression and the machines were not reliable. It should not be a surprise that the Republicans are willing to do things that are unethical to manipulate elections. That’s what we suspect has happened, and we’d like to safeguard our elections so that democracy can still be counted on to work,'” Brzezinski said.
“Later in that year in October, Josh Marshall, wrote about Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell stealing the election and a portion of Michael Moore’s documentary 2004 Fahrenheit 9/11 tried to delegitimize the 2000 results in Florida,” Brzezinski added.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

#Wikileaks #Bombshell: This report will profile a representative donor among the few known illuminati inside the group..

Fwd: Silberstein Foundation: the truth finally comes out

China Says Disappointing Debates Signal ‘Decay Of US Politics’

China Says Disappointing Debates Signal ‘Decay Of US Politics’


China is once again speaking out against the American political process and criticizing the 2016 presidential election.
“The American election has plummeted to new depths,” the state-sponsored Xinhua News Agency said Monday. “The lack of a bottom line in competition between the parties has already become a lack of a moral bottom line.”
Despite Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang’s statement that China “does not comment” on U.S. presidential elections, China regularly criticizes U.S. presidential elections to legitimize its one-party political system. The scandals and intense competition between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are focal points in the Chinese media.
“The second debate between White House contenders Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, considered as one of the nastiest U.S. presidential debates in recent memory, reflects the decay of U.S. politics and a deeply divided society,” Xinhua wrote Tuesday.
Sponsored Content
“The race to the bottom will … make [people] rethink the value of democracy,” the Global Times wrote over the weekend. The “extreme self-confidence and arrogance by the ‘preacher of democracy’ should be reined in,” argued the People’s Daily.
“The chaotic 2016 presidential election has highlighted the defects in the U.S. election system and the dysfunction of democracy,” Zhang Zhixin, head of American Political Studies at the Institute of American Studies at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, a state-owned Chinese think tank, wrote in a China Daily op-ed Tuesday.
Zhang asserts that Clinton’s email scandal “revealed the black box of how party elites manipulate the presidential election.” Speaking of Trump, he argues that regardless of whether Trump wins or loses, “he has irreversibly damaged US democracy already.”
Chinese media asserts that the election has evolved into a series of personal attacks rather than discussions on the issues. The Global Times argues that it is the nature of the U.S. political system that makes candidates fierce.
The view from China of the 2016 election appears particularly bleak. Zhang’s article referred to it as a sign of the “failure of democracy.”
“It is time for the U.S. politics to have self-reflection,” Xinhua concluded. “The 2016 presidential election has made one thing clear, the U.S. needs political reform,” Zhang noted. Their comments mirror American comments advocating political reform in China.

Read more:

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

In the second video of James O'Keefe's new explosive series on the DNC voter fraud for fifty years

Published on Oct 18, 2016
In the second video of James O'Keefe's new explosive series on the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, Democratic party operatives tell us how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale. Scott Foval, who has since been fired, admits that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years.

View Video I here:


Tuesday, October 11, 2016

HIDDEN CAMERA: NYC Democratic Election Commissioner, “They Bus People Around to Vote”

HIDDEN CAMERA: NYC Democratic Election Commissioner, “They Bus People Around to Vote”

In a video released by Project Veritas, James O’Keefe exposes what everyone except Democrats have known to be true. There is a lot of voter fraud. In the video, NYC Democratic Commissioner of the Board of Elections Alan Schulkin is caught on hidden camera at a United Federation of Teachers holiday party admitting that there is widespread voter fraud in New York City.
“Yeah, they should ask for your ID. I think there is a lot of voter fraud,” said Schulkin, who elaborated on the types of voter fraud that are taking place in New York.
Voter fraud has been labeled as a right-wing myth by the left, but Schulkin, a Democrat, confirmed everyone’s worst fears, going against the grain of his own party.
“You know, I don’t think it’s too much to ask somebody to show some kind of an ID…Like I say, people don’t realize, certain neighborhoods in particular they bus people around to vote,” said Schulkin.
When asked about which type of neighborhoods the busing of voters takes place in, Schulkin confirmed that it was minority neighborhoods, adding, “they get busses and they move people around.”
Schulkin expressed concern over voter fraud and suggested that Mayor Bill de Blasio was to blame for a lot of the voter fraud taking place in New York City.
“He gave out ID cards. De Blasio. That’s in lieu of a driver’s license, but you can use it for anything. But, they didn’t vet people to see who they really are. Anybody can go in there and say I am Joe Smith, I want an ID card. It’s absurd. There’s a lot of fraud. Not just voter fraud, all kinds of fraud.”
Despite having disapproval with de Blasio’s faulty ID program and widespread voter fraud, Schulkin also expressed concerns over safety in the polling locations as well as the potential for voter fraud, specifically with regards to Muslims wearing burkas.
“They detonate bombs in the public schools, which we are using. That could disrupt the whole election…Your vote doesn’t even count, because they can go in there with a burka and you don’t know if they are a voter.”
It is clear after listening to a New York City Democratic Election Commissioner that the Democrats are in denial of the fraud that surrounds them. Schulkin confirms that voter ID laws are something that New York City desperately needs as a way to curb voter fraud.

VIDEO: This is just bizarre John Kerry, ‘The Bible Commands Us to Protect Muslims for Global Warming’

VIDEO: John Kerry, ‘The Bible Commands Us to Protect Muslims for Global Warming’

Newly surfaced footage of John Kerry has Americans everywhere scratching their heads. This is just bizarre- even for him. According to reports, Kerry begins the speech by claiming someone named ‘Shrief’ has worked hard to draft a strategy for American and Muslim relations. 
He then goes on to argue that we have an obligation to protect Muslims from global warming. His comments are out completely irrational—almost as if he is the star in a science fiction film.
But it doesn’t stop there. He then takes a page out of Obama’s book, and tries to convince the audience that ‘our faiths’ (aka Christianity and Islam) are ‘inextricably linked.’